home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- > e> For me a rate of around 9 FPS is probably the bare minimum for a
- > e> playable game, I also much
- > e> prefer the 320 x 200 modes aswell with a little shrinking of the
- > e> screen produces a good
- > e> rate.
- >
- > Yes, this sounds about right.
-
- I think 9 FPS would be nice, but even 5 fps feels quite fast if you use
- the mouse insteed of the keyboard, but 7-9 is probably the minimum.
-
- > e> [Maybe some one could develop a Bad Mood accelerator that gets rid of
- > e> certain bottlenecks
- > e> ??? :-) ]
- >
- > Well, that's what the DSP is supposed to be doing - but it unfortunately
- > can't fix the bus too. What a bummer :(
- >
- >
- > :)
- >
- > We need a 68040 & nice big 32-bit local cache, that would fix things nicely!
-
- Hmm... I wonder how fast Bad Mood will be on the Hawk, if it ever gets released.
- The Hawk will have an 48MHz 030 and a rather big cache and the option to a
- new faster DSP with more memory than the orginal DSP (96kb). All all this will
- work around a 32-bit bus speeding up things even more. :-)))) This one could
- be SSSPPPEEEDDDYYYY. :-))))
-
- //Magnus Kollberg
-
-
-